Submission

Submission Instruction

Please log in the Electronic Submission System and upload your paper. English is the official language when you submit your paper and make the presentation. You're required to follow the instructions of the Template when editing paper.

Template Paper (MS Word Format)

Template Paper (LATEX Format)

For accepted papers, one registration covers 5 pages including tables, figures and references, and additional pages will be chargeable.If the paper is more than 5 pages, the extra pages should be charged.

Academic Ethics

Articles submitted to the conference should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtue of any academic. Any act of plagiarism is unacceptable academic misconduct and cannot be tolerated. If an author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:

1) Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
2) Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s)
3) Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
4) Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiarist"

Peer Review

Peer review is vital to the quality of published research. Your submitted article will be evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. Feedback from the peer reviewers will contribute to the editor’s decision on whether to accept or reject your article for publication.

The conference committee invites reviewers who are experts in your article’s subject matter to evaluate the article and provide feedback. Reviewers comment on a variety of points such as whether the study is well designed or if the results are too preliminary. Reviewers can help authors hone key points, identify and resolve errors, and generate new ideas. The reviewers’ feedback informs the final decision on whether to accept or reject the article. AIBT 2026 will perform double-blind review for each paper.

During the peer review process, the reviewers will check:

Scope: Is the article appropriate for this publication?
Novelty: Is this original material distinct from previous publications?
Validity: Is the study well designed and executed?
Data: Are the data reported, analyzed, and interpreted correctly?
Clarity: Are the ideas expressed clearly, concisely, and logically?
Compliance: Are all ethical and journal requirements met?
Advancement: Is this a significant contribution to the field?